Sacco & Vanzetti

In the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti I determined that even before their trial they are guilty by the name of Sacco looks like the most promising culprit due to his “interesting history of being the anarchist going to defend an Italian murderer in trial.  before his beginning of getting involved with one of the anarchist groups  this one known as the Circolo di Studi Sociali which  he joined in 1913 and even helped fund some of their anarchist activities and had written several "interesting" articles in the cults paper. Which I believe this is key point that he was willing openly oppress the government of the United States. shortly after several of them including Vanzetti made haste towards Mexico to escape the draft or conscription of World War 1

In Venisetti’s case they were similar to Sacco’s he to had shown discontent with his life especially after the loss of his mother to which he may have caused him to turn  to reading several anarchist newspapers supported by Sacco. Then moved to Plymouth in 1913 for similar reason as Sacco then continued then we believes that he had continued his anarchist activates with the other participants in the group. Shortly after his arrival in Plymouth he along with the others moved onto Mexico to also escape the draft. Were he took up many old professions but at the same time continued to support the anarchist group. For some unknown strange reason when he returned to the United States in 1917 had registered to become a U.S citizen. In my own opinion it seems as though he may be the most innocent of the duo since he wants citizenship in the U.S. but unfortunately form the data gathered, he held on to an old quote from early on “The blood of martyrs is the seed of liberty”. Which lead’s many us of us to believe that he thinks liberty is an abomination and suggests that he wishes to change the government especially when engaging with the anarchist group.

From eyewitness accounts it seems that several people had seen the crime they had committed, at first there were identifications but the participants that thought that Sacco was one of the bandits but failed to confirm it. This changed in the trail after several of the witness had in trail confirmed Sacco as a culprit a very strange twist which might have been the result of some form of persuasion form some unknown source to have executed.

At the crime scene the local police had discovered several bullet casings the most interesting was the bullet number 3 which several experts claimed was from Sacco’s colt auto weapon which matched the rifling in Sacco’s weapon barrel and being reported him as missing from his day job at the 3-K shoe factory, and was caught several times for lying to police an what stood out the most was the denial of the murder weapon which was clearly his. In the case of Vanzetti there were eyewitnesses to identify him as a syndicate to the crime. For example he was seen in the area of the shooting in a black vehicle suspected criminal transportation. And lying about the origin of his 32. Cal which is claimed to be a .38 cal handgun from which is was obtained from a friend that he would not name or reveal his purpose in

For which I believe that both of these men are to be accused of the crime after both showing a motive and a willing to commit the crime and both being unable to prove their proposed reason  

http://www.enotes.com/w/images/6/63/Sacco_e_Vanzetti.PNG